Jump to content
I Forge Iron

macbruce

Members
  • Posts

    2,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by macbruce

  1. I spose this will rankle some trad folks but here's my 2cents........Butt weld (and I mean 100%) and finish 2 pieces of 1 1/2 x 1/4'' flat to the end of your 1-1/2'' bar and procede. Labor intensive, yes, but you shouldn't lose any serious mass by hammering this way.....

      Or you could split a 1-1/2 x 3/4 bar which would give you lotsa mass and draw it down to 1/2 x 1-1/2'' where needed, very labor intensive.....

  2. I don't know if others have had this problem but when I went to cut the therads into the 1/8 nipple for the welding tip I discovered there wasn't enough meat to cut the threads deep enough to prevent leakage. The solution I used was to gently swage about 3/4'' on the end of the nipple with a tennon tool that just happened to fit the bill.

  3. Use 7018 on critical structural joints and dies, 1/8 or 5/32'' rod. You can get away with ''farmer rod '' on the rest; 6013, 6011 or 7014. Keeping your work strait is tricky as you well know because welds always pull.  Welding say the anvil and the post counterpart true to one another requires  patience and skill. I always do the collumn first, then the anvil. The collumn being a hollow (sq tube I assume)is more likely to give you trouble. I stand the collumn on the base, check it for 90* and tack so that it can be trued the easy way, that is by rocking back against the tack creating an opening  I can slip a piece of shim into (paper even works). Tack it up well, then weld it up front to back, side to side. After the first pass re check it and do your other passes as needed. Let it cool completely and check it again.....When you discover it's out of wack, don't freak out, sometimes an extra bead put on the side you want it to lean to does the trick or if you know about flame straitening it's easily done with a torch.

    I use a digital level allot when building hammer frames. Even if the base plate isn't 100% level I can zero/calibrate the DL to the plate and get perfect 90's every time plus it reads out to one tenth of one degree and that is huge........Mine cost $120 or so 10 years ago but you needen't spend that much....http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=digital%20level&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CGMQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sears.com%2Fsearch%3Dcraftsman%2520digital%2520torpedo%2520level&ei=Rn8NUqeDHYiviQLBkoCYCg&usg=AFQjCNFrmSKKqsjaoFBhY0CKdel0d9sSiA

     

    If you do use a common level make darn shure the base plate LEVEL before fabbing, have fun...... B)

  4. I always thought this archway(s) had allot of class and was pained to see the new owners put such a travesty below it when they decided to put gates below them.....I've done business with the Weckbaugh family for decades but was out of the loop when this happened. Still the arches and other ironwork are what they are. Finished in 1933 this is a historic Denver landmark http://www.google.com/search?q=weckbaugh+mansion+denver&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=H-8IUt7cKOiMyAGJk4GwAw&ved=0CEYQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=850

    I couldn't get inside the fence to take pics of the screen door but it is very nice as are the balcony rails.

    post-15096-0-47210700-1376317056_thumb.j

    post-15096-0-59908100-1376317086_thumb.j

    post-15096-0-69011900-1376317116_thumb.j

    post-15096-0-49914700-1376317136_thumb.j


  5. How would the different sized belts put undue strain on the motor? - depends on tension I'd think for either belt size.

    It takes more pulling force to bring a larger belt up to it's proper tension than a smaller one. Two B belts are about right for a 5HP motor which will power a 100lb LG. The 5hp motor has far bigger bearings to carry the load. The bearings on a poor little 1hp powering a 25 will groan and eventually fail if subjected to this.....I used a single B on my rebuild and it ran Aok but I could have used a single A. The deciding factor was I just happened to have a B-2 groove pull in my barrel of used sheaves that could be machined to fit. It probably wasn't necessary but I removed one of the grooves that I didn't need.

     

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=horsepower%20per%20v%20belt&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CFMQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hitekbalancing.com%2Fblog%2F2011%2F02%2F23%2Fover-sizing-v-belt-drives-a-big-mistake-that-can-cost-you-time-money%2F&ei=bUDzUcOkBIrEiwK1-IDIBw&usg=AFQjCNE9-UGhonNgvvBwzKyZcC02SOmvGQ&cad=rja

  6. Having actual "V's" for the V belts to ride in is not neccesary, the belts work just fine on the original flat belt pulley.

    This is true but in the case of my 25 re build I wanted to slow it down which the larger pulley helped to accomplish. If it had had a rear mounted clutch with a larger diameter bull wheel I would have gladly not gone to all that trouble. Btw, don't get bother putting a 2-3 groove pulley on the thing unless the horsepower requires it. For a 25 one belt will do just fine. If you do use a 2 groove, use A belts. Two B's would put undue strain on your motor bearings.

  7. The one decraven posted looks like a very robust machine and I would like to build one of those....I was following this guy's progress reguarding plans he was going to offer but ran out of patience........

    I crusing ebay and saw (sorry can't link) :rolleyes: these units for sale at a starting bid of $750 w/o motor which ain't bad...(google: ted g belt grinder)....http://www.google.com/search?q=ted+g+belt+grinder&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=JM_dUerUKafDigKe8IC4Bw&ved=0CEIQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=830

    Since I'll be starting a job soon where fabbing a sander and then getting to work isn't an option I'm seriously considering on of these....

×
×
  • Create New...